McGwire and steroids
ESPN:
I've moved on from it and I wish the media would," McGwire said. "I've made my statement in Washington, that's my statement, and when I left Washington that's the last time I was ever going to talk about it, and that's really about it."
McGwire told Congress he'd be interested in speaking out against steroid abuse. Now he said he isn't interested in discussing the steroids issue anymore.
"That statement comes from the heart and that's the way it is," McGwire said. "When I left there, I'm never going to talk about it again.
Know why he doesn't want to talk about it? Because he did it. He's a fraud. He broke the homerun record under false pretenses as did Bonds. These guys ought to be pariahs just like Rose.
Don't overplay your hand
Here's an example from
Our World, Our View of how to grossly overplay your hand. The subject is the
Bill Bennett statement about aborting black babies to reduce crime. Bennett's point was that abortion is reprehensible under any circumstance. A new book
Freakonomics makes the case that crime is down because abortion is up since 1973 and many would-be criminals have been aborted. A caller to Bennett's radio show asked about the theory. Bennett was attempting to make the point that nothing justifies abortion.
When I read this article I was slammed, shocked even yet. There is no denying that in almost 150 years since the Civil War, racism in this country still prevails. This man had a radio show and blatantly stated that to decrease crime in this country, the best course of action is the kill every Black person before they are even born.
Not that I am straightforward anti-abortion. But this man has called for the death, even purification, of a whole race in this country. This man is no better than Adolf Hitler, himself.
Don't be ignorant. More importantly, if you're going to be ignorant, don't attempt to influence others.
The cost of college
Inside Higher Ed:
The cost of attending a public four-year institution rose by 22 percent between 2001-2 and 2004-5 and tuition and fees for in-state students at the institutions grew by 33 percent, more than for any other sector of higher education, according to a U.S. Education Department report issued Thursday.
Supply and demand. However, if I was a college administrator I'd be paying attention to value. How many families can afford $19,420 a year for an in-state school for their frosh daughter to daydream through Poetry 101?
Ward Connerly
Read the whole thing.
The question now, however, concerns where the Republican party should go from here with respect to the matter of black people. First,we must abandon fruitless "outreach" efforts to "the black community," and treat black people as we would any other group of people. The message: We want you to join us in this pursuit of a more perfect union. But, we have no interest in you based on your "race" or skin color. Our interest is based on values that we hope you will share.
I'd spend time with a black capitalist over a white liberal any day.
The military needs our best
Volokh:
"The Nation that makes a great distinction between its scholars and its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting done by fools." - Thucydides
Innovation and productivity are the keys to the economic kingdom
The Economist:
The continued growth in manufacturing output shows that the fall in jobs has not been caused by mass substitution of Chinese goods for locally made ones. It has happened because rich-world companies have replaced workers with new technology to boost productivity and shifted production from labour-intensive products such as textiles to higher-tech, higher value-added, sectors such as pharmaceuticals. Within firms, low-skilled jobs have moved offshore. Higher-value R&D, design and marketing have stayed at home.
All that is good. Faster productivity growth means higher average incomes. Low rates of unemployment in the countries which have shifted furthest away from manufacturing suggest that most laid-off workers have found new jobs. And consumers have benefited from cheap Chinese imports.
Yet there is a residual belief that making things you can drop on your toe is superior to working in accounting or hairdressing. Manufacturing jobs, it is often said, are better than the Mcjobs typical in the service sector. Yet working conditions in services are often pleasanter and safer than on an assembly line, and average wages in the fastest-growing sectors, such as finance, professional and business services, education and health, are higher than in manufacturing.
A second worry is that services are harder to export, so if developed economies make fewer goods, how will they pay for imports? But rich countries already increasingly pay their way in the world by exporting services. America has a huge trade deficit not because it is not exporting enough, but because American consumers are spending too much.
White guilt hurts blacks
Front Page:
The charge of white racism remains, as it has been for the past 40 years, a sword hanging over our society, paralyzing rational discourse and obstructing sensible action in areas ranging from crime prevention to education to anti-terrorism measures to immigration control.
This is a challenging article. Auster's main point is that whites' guilt over past injustices done to blacks prevents an honest discussion. We always begin with the assumption that whites are the cause of all problems in the black community. This prevents new solutions from being tried. However, new solutions are what's needed. Our current way of doing things has failed miserably by any objective measure.
The other problem that prevents an honest discussion is the eagerness of some in the white community to pollute the effort by insinuating that black inferiority is the culprit behind achievement gaps and there is nothing to be done to improve the black condition. This specter haunts all of our discussions and prevents trust. Somehow this view must be marginalized to the point where blacks believe that new solutions aren't designed to cast them adrift, but are meant to raise us all up.
Another sign of the India/China onslaught
Inside Higher Ed:
Although this is not a new problem, it is becoming ever more urgent. We are faced with an engineering juggernaut emanating from India and China, with more than 10 Asian engineers graduating for every one in the United States. Educated at great institutions like the Indian Institutes of Technology or Tshingua University, these engineers are every bit as technically competent as their American counterparts.
Watch the Chris Rock show online
Hewitt on the media
From
PBS last night (HT
Power Line):
They finally had something in which they could appear quasi heroic, and they tried very hard to appear quasi heroic, and in so doing they botched the story. And I just have to object to my fellow guest here, it wasn't that they missed things; there were sins of omission, it's that they reported panic inducing, fear inducing, hysteria inducing mass sort of casualty events, looting, pillaging, murder sprees, sort of the most squalid journalism you could imagine, and I have to ask them and ask the media generally, don't we have to go back and find out how to guard against this sort of thing, because we've had mass disasters in the past, we're going to have them in the future — if media becomes addicted it to — they told me it was so I'll put it out there — that's terrible for democracy to have a media that is willing to suspend their disbelief and report urban myth.
And I think one other thing, Jeff, people have to ask: Why was the media so eager and willing to circulate these stories? Is it because we were dealing with the urban under class, largely black, and largely a community with which the elite media does not often deal? And as a result they were willing to believe stories about this community that they might not have given any credence to in a different situation.
One question I had the whole time was why didn't all the news teams take their cameras and go to the Superdome and the Convention Center and get the real story? If there were rapes and murders and babies dying, wouldn't you want to document it? Seems like a no brainer to me. Were they scared?
Is there anybody in the news business sadder than Dan Rather?
Looks like Mapes and Rather have decided it's time to try to salvage their rep. My advice? Don't waste your breath.
Power Line:
Dan Rather and Mary Mapes are apparently out to rehabilitate themselves through the assertion of several themes related to Rathergate. In his interview with Marvin Kalb, Rather reiterates several of the themes: the Bush National Guard story was accurate, there is something sinister about the exposure of the documents as fradulent, and the documents were not proved to be fraudulent in the Thornburgh-Boccardi report or elsewhere.
Alamance County
It's growing.
Here's why.
Something, every week reminds me that here in our little corner of the world we still see, talk and relate to one another in ways that are conspicuously absent nearly everywhere else I travel.
Ladies and gentlemen
Your next judge.
Global trade is a two way street
It's all over the news when a Chinese firm attempts to buy a US firm. It works both ways.
China Daily:
General Electric Co. plans to buy a 7 percent stake in China's Shenzhen Development Bank in the latest foreign strategic investment in China's increasingly competitive banking market, reports said Thursday.
Through the purchase, valued at about $100 million, GE Consumer Finance hopes to gain entry into China's developing personal loan market, the reports said.
Hear, hear
Novak:
The Senate was up to its old tricks Monday evening. It prepared to pass, without debate and under a procedure requiring unanimous consent, a federal infusion of $9 billion into state Medicaid programs under the pretext of Katrina relief. The bill, drafted in secret under bipartisan auspices, was stopped cold when Republican Sen. John Ensign voiced his objection.
Get it together Democrats
ABP:
One of the reasons that the GOP has been allowed to get away with their seeming drift away from the core principles of their base has been because they’re the only game in town. The GOP can rightfully say “Hey, you think we spend to much and allow too many illegals into the country? Fine. But what’s your option, the Democrats? They’re solution is to spend even more money and make it even easier for more illegals to come into the country”.
And you know what? They’re right. The Democrat party has drifted so far to the left that they cannot be considered a serious alternative. That is a bad thing.
We have said on numerous occasions that even though we delight in bashing Democrats, the country works best when two viable — and sane — parties are compete in the marketplace of ideas. While many scoffed at the thought, especially coming from us, we were, and remain, totally serious.
Update: Fearless prediction #3762: The counter to the co-opted GOP won't be the Democrats. It'll be a third party.
Instapundit thinks so too. It can be Perot style. Just don't let it be Perot like.
Monk and Trane
A new Thelonious Monk/John Coltrane recording has been found and was released Tuesday. Coltrane lived in High Point until he was thirteen.
NNS:
"My father was playing in a fashion I hadn't heard him play, and I had played with him when I was 20. This was like the legend of who he was back then. And when Coltrane started to play ... whoa, this is that band I've always heard about, one of the baddest in the world."
While Coltrane is clearly in top form on the recording, unleashing sizzling lines that presage his improvisational breakthroughs in the following years, it is Monk who captivates with his rich sound and free-wheeling thoughts.
Update: Buy it
here.
The rumors in NO
NYT:
A month later, a review of the available evidence now shows that some, though not all, of the most alarming stories that coursed through the city appear to be little more than figments of frightened imaginations, the product of chaotic circumstances that included no reliable communications, and perhaps the residue of the longstanding raw relations between some police officers and members of the public.
Beyond doubt, the sense of menace had been ignited by genuine disorder and violence that week. Looting began at the moment the storm passed over New Orleans, and it ranged from base thievery to foraging for the necessities of life.
Solid recap of what we actually know happened. It appears that the original horror stories were the result of rampant rumors spread among a whole bunch of people in close contact with no communication with the outside world. The rumors were repeated by officials to the media as factual which gave the rumors credibility and led to rampant speculation by pundits. To read more into it and say that the rumors got out of control because of racism is a bit of a reach. Did some people use the reports of anarchy to reinforce stereotypes? Sure. Are these folks important? Nope and getting less so everyday.
Laissez les bons temps rouler!
New Orleans=Iraq?
Hewitt:
Everything that American media could throw at a story, it threw at New Orleans in the aftermath of Katrina. No expense was spared. All hands were on deck. And yet not one news organization produced anything like complete coverage of the events unfolding inside the city's convention center or the Superdome. Horrific stories of murders and rapes spread like wildfire, reports of little girls with their throats slashed stunned Americans, and hysteria gripped many in the MSM. Weeks later the Los Angeles Times and others began to examine the collapse of the media's own levees that traditionally hold back rumor and urban myth.
Given this failure to capture the true story in New Orleans even with all of the combined resources of all the MSM working around the clock, why would anyone believe that American media is accurately reporting on the events in Iraq from the Green Zone, in the course of a bloody insurgency fought in a language they don't understand? If the combined forces of old media couldn't get one accurate story out of the convention center, why for a moment believe it can get a story out of Mosul or Najaf?
The worst Bush betrayal: backing Specter
Coulter:
In 2004, Bush backed liberal Republican Arlen Specter over conservative Pat Toomey in the Republican Senate primary in Pennsylvania. Bush still lost Pennsylvania and, worst of all, Specter won. So that worked out well.
He hasn't learned:
Also this year, Bush is backing developmentally-disabled Lincoln Chafee over the only Republican in the race, Stephen Laffey, Harvard MBA and mayor of Cranston, RI. Chafee opposes Bush on taxes, Iraq, abortion and gay marriage. This man is literally too stupid to know he's a Democrat. If Chafee hadn't inherited hundreds of millions of dollars, he would be living in a shack tending weeds. In the last election, Chafee famously refused to vote for Bush, instead writing in Bush's father.
How to do it right:
The secret to Reagan's greatness was he didn't need a bunch of high-priced Bob Shrums to tell him what Americans thought. He knew because of his work with General Electric, touring the country and meeting real Americans. Two months a year for eight years, Reagan would give up to 25 speeches a day at G.E. plants — a "marination in middle America," as one G.E. man put it. Reagan himself said, "I always thought Hollywood had the wrong idea of the average American, and the G.E. tours proved I was right."
Because of these tours, Reagan knew — as he calmly told fretful advisers after the Grenada invasion — "You can always trust Americans." The G.E. tours completely immunized Reagan from the counsel of people like Karl Rove, who think the average American is a big-business man who just wants his taxes cut and doesn't care about honor, country, marriage or the unborn.
Reagan knew that this a great country. If only today's Republicans would believe it.
PayPal fraud?
I received this email this morning.
LEGAL NOTICE
The following message is an email sent to you by an administrator of "PayPal.com".
If this message is spam, contains abusive or other comments you find offensive please contact the webmaster at the following address: admin@paypal.com
Message sent to you follows:
Dear PayPal client,
While performing it's regular scheduled monthly billing address check our system found incompatible information which seams to be no longer the same with your current credit card information that we have on file. If you changed your billing information or if you moved from you previous address please follow up the link bellow and update your billing information: If you didn't change any of this information you still need to follow up the previous link and update your existing billing information because it means that our database regular scheduled update wasn't made correctly. Choosing to ignore this message will result in to a temporary suspension of your account within 24 hours, until you will choose to solve this unpleasant situation.
We apologies for any inconvinience this may caused you and we strongly advise you to update your information you have on file with us. Clicking https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_login_ you will avoid any possible futuring billing problems with your account.
Best regards,
- PayPal Team.
I believe this is fraud. When you click on the link, it takes you to http://cliconline.net/.www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscrcmd_login.php.
Be wary.
Mystery solved
MSNBC:
The sex drive of women plummets sharply as they juggle the increasing demands of partners, children and careers, researchers said on Thursday.
Bill Simmons on blogging
The Sports Guy:
I liked your point about New Media. Everyone keeps talking about the Blog Revolution, but what does that even mean? If you were in film school and wanted to make movies for a living, would you create a movie from scratch, or would you just make documentaries about other filmmakers and how much they stunk? You'd make the movie from scratch, right? Well, what's the point of writing about people who write about sports/movies/politics/music if you're not backing up your words with your own columns or features? How do you have credibility then? I could write for a living, I just choose to rip everyone else. What? How does that make sense? What's the ultimate goal there? Why not come up with your own material, angles and thoughts? Wouldn't that be more rewarding? How do you get better? That's what I don't understand.
Delay. I guess I have to gear up for another scandal.
I really hate these campaign finance scandals. Campaign finance laws are just so arbitrary. What is the problem with people giving money to whoever they want in whatever amount they want? Set it up so that there is full disclosure and complete accounting. That way you'll know who has been bought and who did the buying.
In the meantime, the thing I like most about Delay is that he had a real job before going to Congress. It's a shame that you have to be a lawyer to run the country. What I don't like is his recent statement on spending and what a good job Republicans have done of paring down the government.
Read the indictment
here.
Fox:
The indictment charges that DeLay, 58, conspired to have corporate contributions funneled through his political action committee to help Republican state candidates. The $155,000 in fnds from companies, including Sears Roebuck, was allegedly handed over from the PAC in a $190,000 check to the Republican National Committee, which was also given a list of Texas state House candidates and the sums they were to receive.
The indictment included a copy of the check.
"The defendants entered into an agreement with each other or with TRMPAC (Texans for a Republican Majority Political Action Committee) to knowingly make a political contribution in violation of the Texas election code," says the four-page indictment. "The contribution was made directly to the Republican National Committee within 60 days of a general election."
Even communist China wants low taxes
China Daily:
Last month, the National People's Congress (NPC), the top legislature, deliberated but was divided on a draft amendment to the Law on Personal Income Tax, which proposed raising the threshold at which income tax is levied from 800 yuan (US$99) to 1,500 yuan (US$185) per month.
A public hearing was then called to solicit opinion from various circles.
Yesterday, 17 of the 20 speakers - including civil servants, academics and migrant workers - chosen from nearly 5,000 applicants, favoured raising the starting line to 1,500 yuan or higher, with some suggesting 3,000 yuan (US$370).
Oh boy, the WSJ gives Janice Rogers Brown a little love
Opinion Journal:
The left's main target is the jurist liberals know is the president's ultimate Katrina exit strategy, Judge Janice Rogers Brown. Although at her hearing she was a model of grace and intellect and she wrote more majority opinions than any of her colleagues on the California Supreme Court, liberals paint Brown as "unrelenting" and a "lightning rod." Her critics say that she has not been on the federal appellate court very long, even though she has now been on as long as David Souter had been when he was elevated, and she would have had more than two years' experience had Democrats not filibustered her nomination.
Goldberg analysis of Katrina "journalism"
Goldberg:
All of the major newspapers contributed to the hysterical environment, passing on one unconfirmed rumor after another. And, to be fair, almost everyone else in one way or another contributed to the climate as well. The blogosphere bought the hyperventilation hook, line, and sinker. The low point was almost certainly when Randall Robinson ominously disclosed on the Huffington Post that African-Americans in New Orleans had resorted to eating the flesh of corpses to stay alive. This was just days into the flood (it took the stranded Donner party weeks to resort to eating the dead). Yet this supposedly fact-checked blog found it credible that African Americans would eat the bloated carcasses floating in New Orleans' floodwaters almost the second they ran out of groceries.
and...
Race is obviously part of the equation, too. "If the dome and Convention Center had harbored large numbers of middle-class white people," Times Picayune editor Jim Amoss said, "it would not have been a fertile ground for this kind of rumor mongering." As with the cannibalism canard, there seemed to be an eagerness on the part of many — on the Right and Left — to believe the very worst stories possible about poor African Americans.
Email to Howard Coble
After reading this on
Instapundit, here's an email I sent to Howard Coble's office this morning. You should do the same.
Dear Howard Coble,
Hopefully you have heard of the Porkbusters campaign. If not, here's the site.
What locally directed federal spending do you propose cutting to pay for the costs of hurricane relief?
I look forward to your reply.
David Boyd
I have no idea what this means
NYT:
JIDDA, Saudi Arabia, Sept. 27 - The audience - 500 women covered in black at a Saudi university - seemed an ideal place for Karen P. Hughes, a senior Bush administration official charged with spreading the American message in the Muslim world, to make her pitch.
Karen P. Hughes, the under secretary of state for public diplomacy, was hired to publicize American ideals in the Muslim world.
But the response on Tuesday was not what she and her aides expected. When Ms. Hughes expressed the hope here that Saudi women would be able to drive and "fully participate in society" much as they do in her country, many challenged her.
"The general image of the Arab woman is that she isn't happy," one audience member said. "Well, we're all pretty happy." The room, full of students, faculty members and some professionals, resounded with applause.
The administration's efforts to publicize American ideals in the Muslim world have often run into such resistance. For that reason, Ms. Hughes, who is considered one of the administration's most scripted and careful members, was hired specifically for the task.
Many in this region say they resent the American assumption that, given the chance, everyone would live like Americans.
The group of women, picked by the university, represented the privileged elite of this Red Sea coastal city, known as one of the more liberal areas in the country. And while they were certainly friendly toward Ms. Hughes, half a dozen who spoke up took issue with what she said.
Ms. Hughes, the under secretary of state for public diplomacy, is on her first trip to the Middle East. She seemed clearly taken aback as the women told her that just because they were not allowed to vote or drive that did not mean they were treated unfairly or imprisoned in their own homes.
"We're not in any way barred from talking to the other sex," said Dr. Nada Jambi, a public health professor. "It's not an absolute wall."
LGF has an idea. Battered Woman Syndrome.
Hugh Hewitt on the MSM
Money quote. Although there's quite a bit about Dan Rather being Ted Baxter.
Kausfiles comtinues to ridicule the New York Times' New Coke strategy of charging a high price for columns very few people will pay for. The good news is that this fiasco will certainly discourage other papers from experimenting with pay-for-view news. If you aren't the Wall Street Journal, it will be difficult to charge for an internet subscription unless (1) it is for the whole paper and (2)there's a lot of web-only content. This is an obvious rule, but one which the aristocrats couldn't figure out. Reason: They believe we must read them.
Nobody is irreplaceable. Especially not Dowd and Krugman.
Captain not impressed with McCain
McCain met with Sheehan the other day. It didn't go well. She called him a "warmonger."
CQ and I don't mean Congressional Quarterly:
McCain later told reporters that he had been misled into believing that her delegation included some of his Arizona constituents. Otherwise, McCain claims he wouldn't have met with her at all.
Does anyone believe that? McCain's entire career shows him as a rank opportunist, and with his recent moves to establish himself for a run at the 2008 Presidential nomination, he figured he could score a twofer: he could embarrass George Bush and make himself a media darling by getting some friendly face time with Sheehan. Instead, she winds up, predictably, talking about him in shrill tones while he mumbles some excuse about thinking that he would meet an Arizona representative among her staff. In the end, he proved Bush's wisdom in declining a second meeting with the poster woman for the radical Left.
Allow me to crow a little. Is there any doubt Bush was right in declining to meet with Sheehan a second time? She only wanted to embarrass him. He knew it. He won the stare down with the media.
What we ought to take away from Katrina
Most of us, black and white, don't sit around and pontificate about race and what this means or that means. Most of us go to work and try to do well by our families and each other. When someone needs help, we help them. No questions. Yeah, I know, you can find me a bunch of racists on the Internet. But you know what? I can find you a bunch more New Orleans PD and Coast Guard and Red Cross volunteers and National Guard and private citizens and government officials that trump the hell out of your increasingly irrelevant bigots.
Ben Stein:
The big lie of the Hurricane Katrina story is that it reveals deep and hateful racism in America, that blacks were treated worse than other people because they were black, and that this shows the hypocrisy of this supposedly egalitarian nation.
Here's the truth. Many black people were harmed by Katrina because of where they lived relative to the path of the hurricane and the location of their neighborhoods below sea level and their refusal or inability to obey the mandatory evacuation orders for New Orleans. This is not racism. This is a matter of geography, weather patterns, and poverty or confusion. It has nothing to do with purposeful mistreatment of blacks by whites. Poverty and confusion, certainly big factors here, were in no sense caused by white mistreatment of blacks unless it was white mistreatment of blacks that ended many decades ago.
As soon as the rescue effort started -- and although it was tardy, it was just as tardy for whites and Hispanics as it was for blacks -- the main story was whites by the thousands hurrying to New Orleans to rescue blacks from rooftops, from evacuation centers, from hospitals, from old folks' homes. The rescue effort was totally and utterly colorblind. The idea that blacks in New Orleans were left to suffer while whites in Mississippi or Alabama were treated royally is simply fantasy. Whites suffered too, and yes, they were often helped by blacks.
America vs. Europe undercard. America vs. India/China main event.
VDH has thoughts. This is almost a silly subject. America vs. Europe may be important for Europeans, but what's important for America is India and China. With over a third of the world's population, India and China grow more powerful as they move toward freedom and capitalism. The 21st Century is the Asian Century. I don't think many in the US have come to terms with that yet.
For four out of ten Americans today, their physical and spiritual origins have nothing to do with Europe — they are offspring of Asia, Latin America, or Africa. Demographic and immigration realities mean that our ostensible blood link with Europe will continue to thin. Like it or not, more Americans are coming to know and care less about Europe and more about China, Korea, Mexico, India, and the Philippines. The teaching of French, German, and Italian is sliding, while Spanish and Chinese rise.
Religious belief undermines society
It was only a matter of time I suppose until someone made
this jump. Via
Drudge.
Religious belief can cause damage to a society, contributing towards high murder rates, abortion, sexual promiscuity and suicide, according to research published today.
According to the study, belief in and worship of God are not only unnecessary for a healthy society but may actually contribute to social problems.
The study counters the view of believers that religion is necessary to provide the moral and ethical foundations of a healthy society.
Update: A little more from the article.
Gregory Paul, the author of the study and a social scientist, used data from the International Social Survey Programme, Gallup and other research bodies to reach his conclusions.
He compared social indicators such as murder rates, abortion, suicide and teenage pregnancy.
The study concluded that the US was the world’s only prosperous democracy where murder rates were still high, and that the least devout nations were the least dysfunctional. Mr Paul said that rates of gonorrhoea in adolescents in the US were up to 300 times higher than in less devout democratic countries. The US also suffered from “ uniquely high” adolescent and adult syphilis infection rates, and adolescent abortion rates, the study suggested.
It's absurd to make the leap to causality from this kind of study. The US is more religious than other countries and has more social ills so therefore religion causes social ills. The US also is the world's richest country, the world's most powerful country, the world's most diverse country, the world's best football playing country. Why don't any of those things cause social ills? Idiotic. What's wrong with the person writing this story? Challenge the guy.
So why does it make the paper? It gives the newspaper something it can use to sell papers (I guess it makes some Europeans feel good) and it gives the scientist that did the study notoriety and maybe a book deal.
NO police chief resigns
Eddie Compass is out. Compass was the
source of many of the rumours that started flying after the hurricane.
At the Superdome, group of refugees broke through a line of heavily armed National Guardsmen in a scramble to get on to the buses.
Nearby, about 20,000 people who had taken shelter at New Orleans Convention Center grew ever more hostile after waiting for buses for days amid the filth and the dead.
Police Chief Eddie Compass said there was such a crush around a squad of 88 officers that they retreated when they went in to check out reports of assaults.
"We have individuals who are getting raped, we have individuals who are getting beaten," Compass said. "Tourists are walking in that direction and they are getting preyed upon."
Katrina's lesson
Let's all be less hysterical from now on. I pledge to do my part. When you're watching the news, you're getting an incomplete picture. This is true of a natural disaster or a war or an election or anything else.
LA Times:
The wild rumors filled the vacuum and seemed to gain credence with each retelling — that an infant's body had been found in a trash can, that sharks from Lake Pontchartrain were swimming through the business district, that hundreds of bodies had been stacked in the Superdome basement.
"It doesn't take anything to start a rumor around here," Louisiana National Guard 2nd Lt. Lance Cagnolatti said at the height of the Superdome relief effort. "There's 20,000 people in here. Think when you were in high school. You whisper something in someone's ear. By the end of the day, everyone in school knows the rumor — and the rumor isn't the same thing it was when you started it."
Follow-up reporting has discredited reports of a 7-year-old being raped and murdered at the Superdome, roving bands of armed gang members attacking the helpless, and dozens of bodies being shoved into a freezer at the Convention Center.
Hyperbolic reporting spread through much of the media.
Fox News, a day before the major evacuation of the Superdome began, issued an "alert" as talk show host Alan Colmes reiterated reports of "robberies, rapes, carjackings, riots and murder. Violent gangs are roaming the streets at night, hidden by the cover of darkness."
The Los Angeles Times adopted a breathless tone the next day in its lead news story, reporting that National Guard troops "took positions on rooftops, scanning for snipers and armed mobs as seething crowds of refugees milled below, desperate to flee. Gunfire crackled in the distance."
The New York Times repeated some of the reports of violence and unrest, but the newspaper usually was more careful to note that the information could not be verified.
The tabloid Ottawa Sun reported unverified accounts of "a man seeking help gunned down by a National Guard soldier" and "a young man run down and then shot by a New Orleans police officer."
London's Evening Standard invoked the future-world fantasy film "Mad Max" to describe the scene and threw in a "Lord of the Flies" allusion for good measure.
Televised images and photographs affirmed the widespread devastation in one of America's most celebrated cities.
Update:
The AP clarifies.
The stories were told by residents trapped inside the Superdome and convention center and were repeated by public officials. Many news organizations, including The Associated Press, carried the witness accounts and official pronouncements, and in some cases later repeated the claims as fact, without attribution.
But now, a month after the chaos subsided, police are re-examining the reports and finding that many of them have little or no basis in fact.
They have no official reports of rape and no eyewitnesses to sexual assault. The state Department of Health and Hospitals counted 10 dead at the Superdome and four at the convention center. Only two of those are believed to have been murdered.
One of those victims _ found at the Superdome _ appears to have been killed elsewhere before being brought to the stadium, said Bob Johannessen, the agency spokesman.
"It was a chaotic time for the city. Now that we've had a chance to reflect back on that situation, we're able to say right now that things were not the way they appeared," said police Capt. Marlon Defillo.
Sally Forman, a spokeswoman for Nagin, said the mayor was relying on others for his information about conditions at the evacuation sites. "He was listening to officials, trusting that information they were providing was accurate," she said.
College isn't for everyone
Glenn Reynolds:
The third possibility is that men aren't so much underrepresented in college as women are overrepresented. This is plausible. There probably are too many people going to college in general, and it may be that men — more likely to choose, or at least consider, high-paying but unfeminine alternatives like plumbing, or other, more "masculine" alternatives like military service — are less likely to wind up in college as an unthinking extension of high school. If this explanation is true, we can expect to hear little about it from university administrations, who have fully absorbed the marketer's ethos and have little interest in suggesting that college isn't for everyone.
This view will soon begin to be more prominent. However, I doubt much will change right away. We have institutionalized the college degree as a corporate entry barrier. It's an easy way to either elevate or dismiss someone.
It is time to drive the charlatans out of the university
VDH:
More importantly, we have lost sight of what university presidents are supposed to be. Their first allegiance ought to be to honesty and truth, not campus orthodoxy masquerading as intellectual bravery amid a supposedly reactionary society. In a world of intellectual integrity, Robert Birgeneau would ask, "Why are Asians excelling, and what can Berkeley do to encourage emulation of their success by other ethnic groups?" Denice Denton might wonder whether open hiring, monitored by affirmative action officers, applies to university staff or only those who are not associates of the president. President Hoffman would decry Ward Churchill's crass behavior and order a complete review of affirmative action and the politicized nature of hiring, retention, and tenure practices at Colorado. And Larry Summers? In the old world of the campus, he would defend free inquiry and expression, and remind faculty that all questions are up for discussion at Harvard. And if self-appointed censors wished to fire him for that, then he would dare them to go ahead and try.
The signs of erosion on our campuses are undeniable, whether we examine declining test scores, spiraling costs, or college graduates' ignorance of basic facts and ideas. In response, our academic leadership is not talking about a more competitive curriculum, higher standards of academic accomplishment, or the critical need freely to debate important issues. Instead, it remains obsessed with a racial, ideological, and sexual spoils system called "diversity." Even as the airline industry was deregulated in the 1970s, and Wall Street now has come under long-overdue scrutiny, it is time for Americans, if we are to ensure our privileged future, to re-examine our era's politicized university.
A little Supreme Court chess?
New York:
Bush, however, is blessed with circumstances more forgiving than Reagan was. Most obviously, Republicans today control the Senate, which they didn’t then. The only way for Democrats now to block a nomination is by using the filibuster, though that might induce a countermeasure: the dreaded nuclear option, ending the use of filibusters for judicial nominees, that was debated and shelved this past spring. Indeed, one scare scenario currently making the Democratic rounds is that the White House might pursue what’s being referred to as the “sacrificial-lamb strategy”: Nominate one of the wingnuts’ favorites, such as appeals-court justices Priscilla Owen or Janice Rogers Brown, precisely to create a chain reaction that would lead to going nuclear. If the nominee got through, great. But if not, no big deal. The White House would then send up another far-rightist, on the assumption that Democrats would be unable to muster the energy or discipline to defeat two consecutive appointments.
The resurgence of McCain
Lowry:
So McCain is in a different game from other potential candidates. They need money, media attention, and insider buzz. McCain needs the right to stop loathing him, and he seems to realize it.
When McCain went out on the campaign trail with Bush — whom he held in contempt for years after 2000 — and gave him bearhugs, it was clear that the senator’s presidential ambitions hadn’t died. It is hard to believe that those hugs were heart-felt. Indeed, McCain’s campaign will strain his capacities for insincerity. If a second marriage is the triumph of hope over experience, a second McCain presidential campaign, to be successful, will have to be the triumph of experience over the candidate’s own predilections.
McCain's main problem is that of many elites: he comes off as being insincere. He gives this vibe that he's the smartest guy in the room and he knows it and expects you to acknowledge it. In other words, he's patronizing. Bush is the exact opposite. A bit of genuine humbleness will take McCain far.
When is a factual assertion not a factual assertion? When it suits the purposes of The New York Times, of course!
Power Line on The New York Times on Geraldo:
The TV Watch column on Sept. 5 discussed broadcast journalists' undisguised outrage at the failings of Hurricane Katrina rescue efforts. It said reporters had helped stranded victims because no police officers or rescue workers were around, and added, "Fox's Geraldo Rivera did his rivals one better: yesterday, he nudged an Air Force rescue worker out of the way so his camera crew could tape him as he helped lift an older woman in a wheelchair to safety."
The editors understood the "nudge" comment as the television critic's figurative reference to Mr. Rivera's flamboyant intervention. Mr. Rivera complained, but after reviewing a tape of his broadcast, The Times declined to publish a correction.
Numerous readers, however - now including Byron Calame, the newspaper's public editor, who also scrutinized the tape - read the comment as a factual assertion. The Times acknowledges that no nudge was visible on the broadcast.
Silly readers! How could you be so hopelessly literal as to read a declarative sentence in the New York Times as a "factual assertion"?
Remember the good ol' days when Republicans were to be feared?
A picture
Michelle took at the rally.
The insights of Nina Totenberg
I wasn't aware of
this. I'm glad I am now. Just another reason to dismiss her. Not that I didn't dismiss her already. It's that now I have something concrete to go on besides her chirpy, straining, little voice and her obvious communist sympathies.
Our discussion last week on Democrats who wanted John Roberts to share his feelings prompted our friends at the Media Research Center to e-mail us about MRC's 1993 award for "Dumbest Question of the Year." It came in an exchange between NPR's Nina Totenberg and Justice Harry Blackmun on "Nightline." Totenberg was asking Blackmun about death-penalty cases:
Totenberg: Have you ever cried over these cases?
Blackmun: Have I ever what?
Totenberg: Have you ever cried over them?
Blackmun: No.
Good news from Iraq. Another terrorist faces the inevitable.
Fox:
U.S. Special Forces killed Al Qaeda's No. 2 terror mastermind in Iraq, Defense Department officials said.
FOX News has confirmed that Abu Azzam, who was believed to have been in charge of the financing of terrorist cells in the war-torn country, was killed during a raid in Baghdad early Monday morning Iraq time. Azzam is thought to be the top deputy to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, Iraq's most wanted terrorist.
It must be depressing to be a terrorist. It's hot all the time. There's sand everywhere. You're sleeping in spider holes. All your buddies are getting killed.
Worst of all, when you started this war you thought if you got blown up everything would be cool because you'd go to heaven and get 72 virgins. Not a bad way to spend eternity, eh? Alas, it is not to be.
Guardian:
Luxenberg 's new analysis, leaning on the Hymns of Ephrem the Syrian, yields "white raisins" of "crystal clarity" rather than doe-eyed, and ever willing virgins - the houris. Luxenberg claims that the context makes it clear that it is food and drink that is being offered, and not unsullied maidens or houris.
Yep, that's right Zarqawi. Turns out your eternal reward is all the raisins you can eat. That's not even a good Monty Hall prize. That's like the lifetime supply of Turtle Wax behind Door #3. So, sorry buddy, US Special Forces are coming for you. Hope you've had a woman recently because it's getting ready to be a long, dry spell. Oh, don't worry though. Osama will be there soon. Save some raisins for him, huh?
Novak on Republican split
Glad to see more conservatives are finally fed up. The Republican leadership is wrong on spending. If they were Democrats you'd call them on it. Do the right thing.
Novak:
Neither Bush nor congressional leaders will tolerate tampering with the drug subsidy, the president's least popular initiative among conservatives. While the White House would be happy to see some highway pork eliminated, the House leaders absolutely refused. At stake here is a basic disagreement over the philosophy of government within the Republican Party as it nears the end of its 11th year controlling the House of Representatives.
Hastert believes it is not just the privilege but the duty of a House member to deliver federal projects to his constituents. Many younger conservatives could not disagree more, but most -- like Pence -- are loyal Republicans who are loath to criticize their leaders. An exception on the RSC to such reticence is 42-year-old Rep. Jeff Flake of Arizona, who like Pence ran a conservative think tank before entering Congress.
Self-limited to three terms ending next year, Flake has acted as though there is no tomorrow from his first day in the House in January 2001. He, along with Pence, was one of only 25 Republicans to vote against the drug subsidy in 2003. Flake believes big government is addictive. "The leadership hooks the new members when they come into Congress," Flake told me, "and they stay hooked."
Diversity on the court
Via Drudge.
Breitbart:
Bush, asked about his next nominee, said "I will pick a person who can do the job. But I am mindful that diversity is one of the strengths of the country." The president is under pressure from many quarters _ including his wife _ to pick a woman or a minority for the seat of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who is retiring.
Three words,
Janice Rogers Brown. Diverse in the sense that she's one-of-a-kind.
Frontpage:
According to conservative boilerplate, a judge's task is to apply, narrowly, the written law and resist temptation to become a policymaker. Brown's understanding is more expansive. Although she regularly insists that courts are not, indeed, to behave like legislatures, she rejects any notion of the judge as a robotic strict constructionist. In her jurisprudence, courts should function, first and last, as defenders of freedom.
HBO Sunday night - mild spoilers
HBO is back on Sunday night!
Rome has hit its stride. More drama + less history = great fun. HBO replays all the episodes from time to time. Watch them all. They get better every week. There are plenty of tough guys and more than enough conniving women to keep things rolling.
For a season opener,
Curb Your Enthusiasm was in its usual excellent form. Last night focused on Larry's efforts to get the ingredients in a new deli sandwich named for him changed. The deli owner gave him a whitefish, sable, cream cheese and onion sandwich. Larry wanted pastrami and corned beef. However, it was already named for Ted Danson. Hilarity ensues. The funniest gag was Larry getting kicked out of Temple for buying a scalped ticket.
The surprise winner of the night, however, was
Extras. Good lord what a funny show. It's laugh-out-loud funny. There's one bit where the star of the show thinks he's going on a hot date and he's scouring his closet for the perfect outfit. The next scene has him at Bible study in his John Travolta Saturday Night Fever threads. I thought I'd wake up the house laughing. Be warned though, it's not for the easily offended. Last night we covered atheism, phone sex, Catholic priest pedophilia and surefire ways to win an Oscar by portraying a holocaust victim or a retard.
And you thought the US press is biased
The following is what seems to be the mission statment of a section of Aljazeera.net titled
Iraq Under Occupation:
US and British occupation of Iraq is regarded as the re-emergence of the old colonialist practices of the western empires in some quarters. The real ambitions underlying the brutal onslaught are still highly questionable - and then there are the blatant lies over weapons of mass destruction originally used to justify the war. There were no great victory marches by the occupiers, nor were they thrown garlands of flowers and greeted in triumph. More US soldiers have died in Iraq since George Bush declared an end to the war on 1 May 2003 prompting the question: Will Iraq turn into a new Vietnam eventually bringing the US to its senses ... or perhaps to its knees?
Iraq's history, and along with it that of the Arab Muslim world, speaks of several similar encounters. In the past, enemies attacked from East and West before they were swallowed by the moving sands of the region, or forced to retreat, leaving behind a phoenix-like people who adore life and still accept to die for their freedom.
The escalating Iraqi resistance seems to be setting the stage for another act which might usher in a new Arab World or set the clock ticking for the end of yet another empire.
NYT one-ups N&R
From Greensboro's
News & Record a few days ago on the front page of the Life section:
Avondet is the local representative for Passion Parties, a large and growing company that sells adult-oriented products to women via small parties.
Chalk up the company's success — revenues have grown by 40 to 50 percent annually for the past four years — to a society that's increasingly comfortable with, and bombarded by, sexuality.
"We see it on TV and everywhere a lot more than ever," says 39-year-old Mary Sullivan, who recently gathered with five co-workers for a Passion Party in Greensboro.
"You couldn't even see (I Dream of) Jeannie's belly button when I was a kid."
Blink all you want. It won't change the fact that Avondet is passing out packets of Pure Satisfaction Uni-Sex Enhancement Gel to party guests.
"This is what enhances your relationship and wakes up all those little nerve endings," she tells them. "You can go to the bathroom and try some to see how you like it. Your homework is to go home and call me, and tell me how it went."
Here are the
N&R's Editor's comments on the decision to run the story and readers' responses.
Now for
The New York Times' version of another titillating story that made the front page of the Metro section on 9/21:
There is a narrow parking lot in Cunningham Park in Queens surrounded by playing fields for adult softball and youth soccer and baseball. At one end of the lot, retirees arrive to practice their golf and mothers in minivans gather to wait for their Little Leaguers.
The other end is popular with another set with a much lower profile in this suburban setting: gay men cruising for sex. Their playing field is the parking lot itself and the goal is a sexual encounter, usually quick and anonymous.
Comments from Heather MacDonald of City Journal:
No, the reason the Times found this story so worthy of the public’s attention was certainly the claim made by the older gay regulars that the “vast majority” of cruisers are family men drawn to the parking lot’s blandishments. One “longtime parking lot user” tells Kilgannon: “I can’t tell you how many guys I’ve had here who were wearing wedding bands, with baby seats in the car and all kinds of kids’ toys in the floor.”
This makes the parking lot even more of a “paradise” for the Times’s anti-bourgeois staff: it allows them to throw mud for the ten-millionth time on the Leave-it-to-Beaver “normalcy” (scare quotes courtesy of Timesian world-view) of the white-bread suburbs. One would have thought that the Times’s own story this summer about the new “multicultural” suburbs would have finally provided these long-suffering neighborhoods a respite from elite scorn. Alas, it was not to be. Undoubtedly chagrined by the findings in the latest nationwide sex survey that only 2 percent of men self-identify as homosexual, rather than the 10 percent trumpeted by gay activists, the Times has found a rebuttal: self-declaring heterosexual married fathers with a “suburban . . . house, a mortgage, a wife and children” perform gay sex acts with strangers in the privacy of their SUVs.
Just in: Baby Boomers invented sex
Never has a generation gotten so much mileage out of its teenage years. Most people grow out of adolescence. They realize there's a bigger world out there and it's all been done before. Then they go on to do something productive.
However, the boomers think they were actually original. They think nobody knew about sex until they came along. They think they invented creative ways to use drugs. They think they started music. They even believe their feelings are important.
Stop it. Just stop it. Stop with the folk singing and the pot smoking and the VW vans and the rallies and the peace signs. News flash: The horse you continue to beat turned to Elmer's in the 70s. It's over. You are the most unappreciative, self-absorbed, spoiled generation in the history of the world. Your parents beat The Third Reich and fought the most brutal war imaginable in the Pacific. They put a man on the moon for goodness sake. What have you done besides getting down? Thank God for you or we'd never have had The Hustle.
WP:
Out there, in front of the Washington Monument, it was eerily reminiscent of another place and time, a time when the Old Guard was young and the Young Guard didn't yet exist, and people made a point of not putting their trust in anyone over a certain age. A whiff of weed wafted on the air. Couples made out in the grass, oblivious to anyone but each other. Onstage, Joan Baez stood solo, guitar strapped like a weapon against her chest, crooning "Where have all the flowers gone?" while people stood swaying, some crying, fingers forming peace signs or holding up posters of Che.
Everybody is piling on Bush
Is everyone serious about overspending or will they all cut and run when we start talking specifics?
Sullivan:
The first excuse was the war. After 9/11 and a wobbly world economy, that was a decent excuse. Nobody doubted that the United States needed to spend money to beef up homeland security, avert deflation, overhaul national preparedness for a disaster, and fight a war on terror. But when Katrina revealed that, after pouring money into both homeland security and Louisiana’s infrastructure, there was still no co-ordinated plan to deal with catastrophe, a few foreheads furrowed.
Then there was the big increase in agricultural subsidies. Then the explosion in pork barrel spending. Then the biggest new entitlement since Lyndon Johnson, the Medicare drug benefit. Then a trip to Mars. When you add it all up, you get the simple, devastating fact that Bush, in a mere five years, has added $1.5 trillion to the national debt. The interest on that debt will soon add up to the cost of two Katrinas a year.
What do you think will happen when Democrats regain control? Bush has shown them the way on spending. In addition to their usual laundry list, they'll fund left wing schemes conceived from Berkeley dorm room menage a trois between bong hits.
Sullivan again:
I believe in lower taxes. But I also believe in basic fiscal responsibility. If you do not cut spending to align with lower taxes, you are merely borrowing from the next generation. And if a Republican president has legitimised irresponsible spending, what chance is there that a Democrat will get tough?
This may, in fact, be Bush’s real domestic legacy. All a Democratic successor has to do is raise taxes to pay for his splurge, and we will have had the biggest expansion of government power, size and responsibility since the 1930s. What would Reagan say? What would Thatcher? But those glory days are long gone now — and it was a Republican president and Congress that finally buried them.
Salon personals
Today's vixen's plea:
"Why you should get to know me: "I'll teach you about the enneagram and embarrass you in public.""
Since she's not worried about embarrassing herself in front of hundreds of Salon readers, you better believe she's speaking the truth about embarrassing you.
Heaven on the web
Instapundit points the way to
heaven. Cut, cut, cut. Oh my.
I got rid of $1.2 trillion without really trying.
Trouble for Bush; McCain steps up.
Borger:
As far as the deficit hawks in the GOP are concerned, the president has morphed into a bleeding-heart liberal. And so they have disowned him, with House Republicans promising something called "Operation Offset" --ways to cut $24 billion in pork-barrel spending in the highway bill, even delaying the Medicare prescription drug benefit, planned to take effect in January, to save $31 billion. Arizona Sen. John McCain takes it one step further: He wants to cancel the drug benefit. "It was a bad idea to start with," he told me. "The costs are out of sight. It's supposed to cost literally trillions of dollars over its lifetime." The Bushies just say no--and seem to believe we can do it all without any change in policy--as the split within the party widens.
I could really get behind McCain if he would change his thinking on campaign finance. I agree with McCain that campaign finance is a problem, it's just that his solution is so ridiculous. It worries me that he can't see it. It is too personal an issue for him.
Anyway, he's right about the prescription drug benefit and it takes courage to say so.
There's going to be a fight over the next Supreme Court nominee
It doesn't matter who it is there's going to be a fight. You may as well nominate someone good (i.e. an originalist). Send Janice Rogers Brown up there. Let Schumer go a few rounds with her. After that, he'll be begging for Bork.
The NYT via
Volokh:
On the conservative side of the party, Mr. Brownback and Senator Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, another member of the Judiciary Committee, devoted much of their time for questioning Judge Roberts to delivering messages to the White House about the importance of overturning precedents supporting abortion rights.
In an interview last week, Mr. Brownback said he would vote against a nominee who was not "solid and known" on cultural issues like abortion, same-sex marriage and religion in public life.
"If the president doesn't nominate a solid nominee, that is going counter to what he campaigned on," Mr. Brownback said. And if such a nominee "involves a contentious battle, then let it be."
"I think you are going to see a contentious battle regardless of who is nominated," he added, "even if it is Judge Roberts's twin brother."
How to blog
Why not blog? It's free and you get to stick it to the man (or French, lesbo, tree-hugging, anti-SUV busybody being, hybrid driving, bicycle pedaling, non-bath taking, drum-circle sitting, anti-American hippie).
How-to.
Another sign of the occurring MSM apocalypse
John In Carolina writes about the difference in coverage of the anti-war rally in DC between blogs and the MSM.
The difference is striking. The monopoly continues to crumble. Don't think it's akin to a monopoly? Explain the NYT and the Washington Post
sharing scoops before publication. The MSM is the Ozymandias of the 21st century.
OZYMANDIAS of EGYPT
Shelley
I met a traveller from an antique land
Who said:—Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
Stand in the desert. Near them on the sand,
Half sunk, a shatter'd visage lies, whose frown
And wrinkled lip and sneer of cold command
Tell that its sculptor well those passions read
Which yet survive, stamp'd on these lifeless things,
The hand that mock'd them and the heart that fed.
And on the pedestal these words appear:
"My name is Ozymandias, king of kings:
Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair!"
Nothing beside remains: round the decay
Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare,
The lone and level sands stretch far away.
Government builds trailer parks
Andrew Sullivan has a post about FEMA's plan to build trailer parks instead of provide housing vouchers for hurricane evacuees. Absolutely. Allow the evacuees to have some input on where they settle. Confining evacuees to trailer parks will end badly. Guaranteed. Plus, providing housing vouchers in this instance may pave the way for using vouchers in other areas (schools!).
Urbanity and sprawl
David Wharton
posts about improving test scores in Raleigh due to economic integration of the schools. Long bus rides for some students is one problem of the system. Many other aspects are positive.
David writes:
And let me make one "urbanist" observation: the long busrides that this program entails for the students might be a little less long if those "sprawling suburbs" were a little less sprawly: just something that future homebuyers in Raleigh might want to factor into their housing decisions.
There's no question that sprawl causes all sorts of problems. Personally, I don't understand why folks move to a suburb where their house is ten feet from their neighbor's. Seems to me they'd just stay in town, but that's just me thinking out loud. However, there must be positive aspects of sprawl too or folks wouldn't continue to buy houses away from the center of cities. The free market, property rights side of me says it's your land, do what you want. Who is the government to tell you you can't live where you want. So what's the solution?
Update: The positive aspects of the program are dubious. It was another scam brought to you by the NYT. Wharton has the
details.
Wolfowitz plans to reform the World Bank
Results. The enemy of the bureaucrat.
"Whether investing in education, health, infrastructure, agriculture, the environment, we in the World Bank must be sure that we deliver results," Wolfowitz told world finance ministers and central bankers.
"And by results, let me be clear. I mean results that have a real impact in the day-to-day lives of the poor. We stand accountable to them," he added
By pushing results-driven programs, Wolfowitz will be responding to a long-standing U.S. government objective that was a source of friction between former World Bank president James Wolfensohn and the Bush Treasury Department.
Malkin at rally
Michelle Malkin went to the Cindy Sheehan rally. She's got tons of photos.
I wonder if these people know how much harm they do to their cause?

Chinese yuppies
It's the 80s all over again except this time in China.
Wang Chung needs to get the band back together quick.
China Daily:
A "people's war" on narcotics in China has turned into a campaign against designer drugs after police found a surge in usage of ecstasy, ketamine and methamphetamine, or ice, among urban professionals.
China has launched a campaign against designer drugs after police found a surge in usage of ecstasy. In a shift that may be down to a booming economy and the growing influence of globalised culture, Chinese authorities said this week the focus of their anti-drugs campaigns has widened from disadvantaged social groups - such as minorities, prostitutes and the unemployed - to affluent white-collar workers.
Life's good. In a few years, not so much.
Just wait until we begin to deal with a nuclear Iran. Iraq will seem like a quaint memory.
There are no good solutions yet. However, the longer we wait, the less likely we are to find one. How's that for a paradox?
Opinion Journal:
Still, these approaches are of limited use. Thanks to several decades of clandestine effort, Iran already has most, if not all, of the industrial base and technological components it needs to build a bomb. And while it is both right and necessary to encourage democratic forces in Iran, as an antiproliferation strategy it is hardly sufficient.
The most probable means by which Iran's nuclear ambitions could be stopped--military strikes--is the one Western policy makers are most reluctant to contemplate. We often hear that there are no good military options, both because Iran's nuclear installations are dispersed, hidden and hardened and therefore difficult to destroy, and because the consequences of military action--Iranian retaliation, possibly against Israel or in Iraq--could be severe. Yet if diplomatic and peaceful means don't succeed, how else will Iran be stopped? We have yet to hear a serious answer.
It is a conceit held by too many senior Western policy makers that, as negotiations drag on over Iran and North Korea, we are playing these regimes for time. In fact, they are playing us.
Fearless Supreme Court prediction
Bush will not nominate someone like O'Connor. Not just because it would be
impossible to find someone like her, but because he's got nothing to lose. This is the time to go for a home run. Bush needs a win with the base more than he needs to appease Teddy Kennedy.
Revolt of the small government conservatives
Barnes:
Though few in number, the small government conservatives are a problem for Bush. His power as president is based partly on his ability to marshal huge Republican majorities in Congress along with a handful of Democratic renegades. If the RSC types--30 or more of them in the House and a half-dozen in the Senate--reject his hurricane recovery legislation, the Bush majority may vanish. White House aides profess not to be worried about the revolt of small government conservatives. But it's a bigger threat than they imagine.
You better pay attention Republican leadership. Alienate your core and you will be lost.
2006 House
Power Line:
I had lunch last week with a Republican Congressman (not my own) who expressed serious concern that the Democrats may retake the House in 2006. Conventional wisdom is that redistricting makes that almost impossible because relatively few seats are in play. But, as this Congressman pointed out, in 1994 the Republicans won a number of seats not previously considered "in play." If Republican voters don't believe that the Republican Congress is making a serious effort to restrain spending and maintain fiscal responsibility, 2006 could be a disaster for the party. The forces of limited government and fiscal responsibility still exist on Capitol Hill, but they need all the support they can get. Please contact your Senators and Congressman and urge them to balance all hurricane relief spending with cuts in other domestic appropriations.
Yep. I'm afraid Republicans are going to have to lose though for the message to resonate. If they continue to eek out wins they'll maintain the status quo. And besides, what did they think would happen when they abandoned principle and began trying to outspend Democrats. Forget about it. We'll go bankrupt before the Democrats lose on spending. Hopefully there will be a Goldwater to emerge. However, it hasn't worked out too well for the Democrats waiting on another FDR.
Analysis of US position on Iran from a Middle East point of view
Aljazeera:
Indeed, Iran has cunningly chosen the right time for attacking the positions of the EU in the negotiating process and of the United States, which is seeking to affect it.
With current quagmire in Iraq, the U.S. is totally incapable of engaging in another military conflict as an answer to the possibility of Iran's withdrawal from the Non-Proliferation Treaty.
There are several elements that make the superpower's unlimited capabilities greatly doubted.
First; the U.S. military’s actions in Iraq are clearly disfavoring the United States in the eyes of the international community. Second, the continuous failure of the U.S. military operations in Afghanistan to crush remnants of Taliban regime. Also, the U.S.’s military bases in Central Asia have become impotent. Then came Katrina and Rita to give the final touch to the picture, pushing oil prices to a record high, $68 per barrel.
Experts predict that if the U.S. attacked Iran, which produces almost three times as much oil as Iraq, this would push oil prices to $90-100 per barrel. Also in case the U.S. strikes Iran, according to economic analysts, OPEC won’t be able to make up for a sharp price increase, bringing about a serious crisis on the oil market and may even collapse.
Guilford GOP Chairman to shut down blog
Marcus Kindley feels alone in the world of liberal Greensboro bloggers.
I'd post a comment on your site, Marcus, but I'm not taking the time to register with Blogger. Maybe you'll see this.
You have the opportunity to make a big impact and influence a lot of people. Obviously many people visit your site. Obviously many of them come loaded for bear. Some are sycophants. Some are not. You drive them all crazy.
There's a reason Republicans have been winning elections: More of the country agrees with conservative positions than liberal positions. You are not alone.
Well, well, well Senator Schumer
A couple of Schumer's staffers obtained the Social Security Number for the Maryland Lieutenant Governor and pulled his credit report. Wonder what they were looking for? Oh yeah, guess which party Lieutenant Governor, aspiring Senatorial candidate Michael Steele belongs to.
Malkin.
Bush and fiscal conservatives
Kos:
It's a wonder that any fiscal conservatives still stick by Bush.
Democrats are now the party of fiscal sanity and responsibility.
Fiscal conservatives have nowhere to go. The only hope is to reform the GOP from within. It's a joke to say that Democrats are the party of fiscal sanity and responsibility. What are the chances they'd reduce spending?
Want to know how rich and decadent we've become?
The WSJ Weekend Journal has a front page article on the dilemma some of us are having storing our $44 a pound Erborinato di Pecora. Some of us are building additions to our basement wine cellars or adding special aging caves for the cheese. I swear if I wasn't such a believer in capitalism, I'd be a communist.
New Orleans: Let's find out
Weisberg:
Unfortunately, the conservative war on poverty in New Orleans probably won't take place in any concerted way, because Republicans and Democrats are equally terrified about what might happen. Conservatives don't necessarily want their panaceas tried out, for fear their utopia might not be so dreamy after all. Liberals don't want conservative ideas tested for a different reason. They're afraid that some of them might actually work.
I for one, as a conservative, want to find out. Let's do it.
There is no hope for liberals
EJ Dionne:
Here's a fact getting far too little attention: The cost this year alone of the Bush tax cuts enacted in 2001 and 2003 comes to $225 billion. In other words, the revenue lost because of tax cuts going through this year without any congressional action would more than pay the costs of Katrina recovery.
Revenue isn't lost due to tax cuts. This assumes the revenue is the government's to begin with.
How to compare Congress to a crack ho
Goldberg:
Sure: Bush’s response to Katrina wasn’t racist, and not nearly so incompetent as it seemed at first, but it was still far less than sufficiently competent — and it was indisputably politically disastrous. As we look to the future, what are we supposed to say? Hell no his overspending isn’t irresponsibly lavish! His overspending is simply responsibly lavish! The porkbusters fight is fun now, but not since early cave men tried to train grizzly bears to give them tongue-baths has a project seemed more obviously doomed to end in disappointment. Expecting Congress — of either party — to give back pork which has already been approved and passed into law is like expecting crack whores to give refunds days after services have been rendered.
Fortress Re, the criminals that weren't
How do you steal $1.12 billion and not go to jail? Easy, get in the insurance business.
Cone has more.
Is Kelo coming to Greensboro?
From a
News & Record exclusive we have,
The city is working to turn the fire-wrecked apartments owned by landlord Bill Agapion on 211 N. Cedar St. over to a private developer.
then this,
Gaining access to the land may be a problem, however.
The city does not have the power to condemn it for redevelopment reasons. And Agapion's daughter and business partner, Irene Agapion-Palamaris, said they do not have any plans to sell the property at this point.
"As far as I know there is no contract," she said. "There is nothing going on there."
You don't think the city would attempt to use eminent domain to take land from one private citizen to give to another, do you?