Boyd

Victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror, victory however long and hard the road may be; for without victory, there is no survival. - Churchill
Insight from The Nation
The Nation:

For some time I have been suggesting here that the aim of Republican strategy has been a Republican Party that permanently runs the United States and a United States that permanently runs the world. The two aims have been driven by a common purpose: to steadily and irreversibly increase and consolidate power in GOP hands, leading in the direction of a one-party state at home and a global American empire abroad.

As I've said many times, the Republicans have taken advantage of their conservative constituents. Republicans have consolidated and abused their power. They have attracted would-be politicians because they're in power, not because these politicians share conservative principles.

What's the answer? Elect Democrats? Don't be silly. You think they've become un-corrupt in the ten years they've been out of power?

Here it is. Laid out. Solve the problem once and for all no matter who's in charge.

1. Term limits. 12 years. 2 Senate terms. 6 House terms.
2. A uniform geographical formula for drawing house districts or elect all representatives at-large. Safe districts have to go. They're anathema to democracy.
Posted by David on November 28, 2005
Glenn C Jordan Jr (mail):
Couldn't agree with you more about the districts. Rotten burroughs are the greatest shame of all in our current political system. The NC General Assembly is just as bad if not worse than Congress. Republican and Democrat esteem would rise in my eyes if they only dealt fairly with this issue and paid attention to nothing else for the next year. It wouldn't bother me one bit, but I'm not holding my breath.
11.28.2005 7:51pm
David (mail) (www):
I'm not holding my breath either. It's a travesty that only 30 House races out of 435 are competitive.

I'm serious about the at-large thing. It can't be worse than what we have now.
11.28.2005 8:07pm
Ed Cone (mail) (www):
Gerrymandering is epidemic. It's a very real problem.
11.28.2005 8:41pm
:
We agree one more time!
11.28.2005 9:16pm
Brian Baute (mail) (www):
Yes, yes, yes. Term limits and real districts. But how to achieve it? It's a goal worth working for, but where to start? Seems like term limits is the more immediately achievable of the two (avoiding the quagmire of re-drawing districts). Is there an existing organized movement around term limits? Or is there a need for one to be formed?
11.29.2005 9:20am
David (mail) (www):
I have no idea where to start. This is probably the toughest reform of all next to taxes. You're asking people in power to give it up voluntarily with both term limits and sensible districts.
11.29.2005 10:13am

Post as: [Register] [Log In]

Account:
Password:
Remember info?